The Silent Killers
Chapter 5: The Immunization Fraud – Do Vaccines Work? – Rubella (German Measles)
Fear is a powerful motivator. You’ve been indoctrinated to fear this virus because in the mid 1960’s thousands of babies were born with significant crippling defects that were associated with the mother contracting German measles during her pregnancy. Rubella has been around for a long time, first identified in 1619. There were minor epidemics every 6-9 years and major ones every 30 years: https://www.britannica.com/science/rubella Something happened in 1964 that resulted in significant numbers of infections that got everyone’s attention. It could have been an epidemic cycle. It could have been tied to the major growth spurt in America’s population that would have shown more cases during that time. It could have been a major change in dietary habits, food additives and farming with pesticides that became more popular during that time. These things will negatively affect immune health, making some people more susceptible to displaying severe symptoms. We can only speculate.
It is true that when a pregnant woman is infected with the virus associated with German measles symptoms, the virus can cross the placental barrier, infect the fetus and result in fetal damage. The best way to prevent this from happening is to allow young girls to become naturally infected with the virus. This will convey permanent protection of infection that will last her entire life and she needn’t worry about an infection during pregnancy.
But modern medicine has a better plan: inject young girls with the live attenuated rubella virus. This will create those serum antibodies that can only react to future infections. The thought is, if she gets infected with the rubella virus while she is pregnant, those antibodies will be there to lessen her symptoms. That may be true to some degree, however the woman will still be susceptible to infections when she is pregnant, and so will the fetus.
Since the complete virus is being injected, the package insert warns that women who are pregnant should NOT be injected. It also warns that women who do get injected, should not get pregnant for 1 month after the injection. Unfortunately, some women who got injected did get pregnant, and others were injected WHILE pregnant. They were tracked, and there were birth defects, fetal deaths, and miscarriages. The exact numbers were reported two sections ago in the discussion about measles. It’s impossible to know if these tragedies were due to injecting the measles viruses, mumps viruses or rubella viruses because they are all injected at the same time in the form of the MMR shot.
You might be wondering where these “live” rubella viruses in the shot come from. As you already know, viruses are not living things, so they are either made in a laboratory, or living tissue cells are used to make more copies of the viruses. But, to make or copy them, you must get one to start with. Swabbing the mucus of infected persons collects other viruses and bacteria that makes it difficult to find exactly what you’re looking for. Remember, the mucosal lining is where viruses and bacteria get trapped naturally, and we breath in about 100 million various viruses every day. So, trying to isolate something from that snotty mix is difficult. We also discussed that the only way to know if a person is infected with a virus is to find it inside the body, in tissues, blood or lymph, not outside the body in mucus.
The scientists decided it was best to look inside the bodies of aborted fetuses. When the scientists were developing this shot, it was illegal to perform abortions in most states. But the rubella scare allowed doctors to perform “therapeutic abortions” for medical reasons on pregnant women who were infected with the rubella virus. www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/160205-zika-virus-rubella-abortion-brazil-birth-control-womens-health-history Several dozen aborted fetuses were collected and studied. The 3rd organ analyzed (the kidney), from fetus number 27 is where the virus was harvested from. That’s why the strain used in the shot today identified in the package insert is called RA 27/3, “Rubella Abortus 27th fetus 3rd organ”. Then, they used and still use human cells called the WI-38 diploid cell line to be infected and make copies of the virus. That cell line came from the elective abortion of a normal fetus by a Swedish woman in 1963. Here’s that link to the package insert again: https://www.fda.gov/media/75191/download
Do not be afraid of allowing your child to experience a natural rubella infection. A natural infection will train their innate immune system to provide life-long cellular protection of future rubella infections. The shot can’t do that. The shot can only provide adaptive serum antibodies that are designed to react to future infections. You and your child may have life-long protection of infection and not even know it because as many as 50% of natural rubella infections in children are asymptomatic and go undetected. Even an asymptomatic infection provides life-long protection of future infections. There is a test for antibodies that will show if you had an infection in the past. It is important to know that if you do not show a positive test for these serum antibodies, you can still have cellular protection of infection immunity. It takes a natural infection or a shot to make the antibodies that are tested for. Some people with robust innate immunity never get infected, therefore will not have serum antibodies. Yes, you can have immunity without antibodies and that is a difficult concept for many to understand.
The Silent Killers
Wonderfully clear. I've asked colleagues what exactly do they think is being sought by swabbing the nasal cavity? Don't you remember how mucous works? Do you know what cilia is for? That's not how illness is determined! Same about antibodies. OK, so we've got demonstration of antibodies with the shots. That's it? We've reduced immunology to production of demonstrable antibodies? Oh boy. The use of fetal cells is also something people just don't seem to get. How do you get a whole virus? Gotta have some living cell to carry it. Where you gonna get one? Yes, I am just restating in pedestrian terms but my goodness it really is that simple.
Dr Stillwagon, do you think the vaccine proponents focus so much on antibody production because it is easy to measure, or at least easier than measuring other signs of immune system activation? Can we measure the other parameters of the immune system using lab tests?