Wow. A real shift here in my perception is occurring because this explanation of the role of viruses is like a mini paradigm shift or something. I must now catch up and read all your previous installments!
Am I wrong to consider this explanation a sort of middle ground between those who say viruses don't exist and are just particles of waste of sorts (I might be mangling this a bit) and those who claim all viruses are dangerous disease spreaders (germ theory)?
Hi Dr Stillwagon. Very good article, once again. I didn’t understand the following segment. I thought this is what viruses did. Could you please explain further? Thanks.
“It is important to know that the cell is making copies of the virus intelligently and on purpose. The virus is not making copies of itself, as it does not have the intelligence nor the desire to do that. In fact, the cell can decide to NOT make copies of the virus. The cell can instead use parts of the virus to make new proteins to change cellular function.”
These are bold new ideas that will be rejected at first, but over time will become self evident because truth always prevails. Viruses that emerge from nature are not our enemies. They contain necessary genetic information to keep our species updated so that we can survive the environmental changes that we ourselves created. This is done by having the virus copied inside of ourselves to be used by us and also transmit to others to be used by them. There is genetic information inside of viruses that can be used to make new proteins to change cellular function for specific cell lines. Some of the genetic information in viruses is so critical to our survival that it will get permanently integrated into the human genome to pass through generations.
There is innate intelligence with our cells that make all of this happen. The virus itself is not alive and has no intelligence nor the desire to do anything at all. The virus is just genetic information that our bodies can use or reject.
Unfortunately, since viruses are not living things, man can modify them or create new ones. These can be our enemies. Our bodies, if healthy, have the intelligence to reject these man-made particles by using cellular innate immunity. But, some people will not use their God given intelligence and will allow these man-made particles to be injected right through that protective layer and into their bodies. Then, it's too late.
I will be writing extensively on these concepts soon.
Thank you for the explanation. So viruses that do cause disease would be considered rogues that don’t have anything to contribute to the cell? Why would cells replicate pathogenic viruses, then?
The virus is not the cause of the disease, although it looks like it is because of association. The disease is a collection of symptoms that MIGHT happen when the human body is taking the genetic information in the virus and incorporating it. This incorporation can be called an "update" to ones physiology, although many scientists prefer to not call it that. Whether or not a person displays symptoms or how severe the symptoms are; this is all tied to the condition of the immune system, not the virus. There is also "viral load" to consider. If a person comes in contact with inordinately high numbers of viruses that are pathogenic (associated with disease symptoms), even a healthy immune system can become overwhelmed and display symptoms. Remember though, symptoms of viral infections are always manageable with safe and proven methods that do not involve shots.
Why would cells replicate pathogenic viruses? The omicron variant is a good example. Omicron was a mutation done intelligently and on purpose using APOBEC enzymes inside of our cells to spread easily among the human population to give us cross reactive T-cell immunity to more virulent variants that could be forthcoming (some of which could be man-made). Humans will screw this up, though, by continuing to get booster shots. Booster shots will erase the T-cell cross reactivity. The boosted will be susceptible to future variants. The unvaccinated will not be susceptible to infection due to intact T-cell cross reactivity. Check out my 1 hour PowerPoint presentation on rumble.com/kevinstillwagon if you want to dig deeper.
Wow. A real shift here in my perception is occurring because this explanation of the role of viruses is like a mini paradigm shift or something. I must now catch up and read all your previous installments!
Am I wrong to consider this explanation a sort of middle ground between those who say viruses don't exist and are just particles of waste of sorts (I might be mangling this a bit) and those who claim all viruses are dangerous disease spreaders (germ theory)?
Thanks for your work here.
Hi Dr Stillwagon. Very good article, once again. I didn’t understand the following segment. I thought this is what viruses did. Could you please explain further? Thanks.
“It is important to know that the cell is making copies of the virus intelligently and on purpose. The virus is not making copies of itself, as it does not have the intelligence nor the desire to do that. In fact, the cell can decide to NOT make copies of the virus. The cell can instead use parts of the virus to make new proteins to change cellular function.”
These are bold new ideas that will be rejected at first, but over time will become self evident because truth always prevails. Viruses that emerge from nature are not our enemies. They contain necessary genetic information to keep our species updated so that we can survive the environmental changes that we ourselves created. This is done by having the virus copied inside of ourselves to be used by us and also transmit to others to be used by them. There is genetic information inside of viruses that can be used to make new proteins to change cellular function for specific cell lines. Some of the genetic information in viruses is so critical to our survival that it will get permanently integrated into the human genome to pass through generations.
There is innate intelligence with our cells that make all of this happen. The virus itself is not alive and has no intelligence nor the desire to do anything at all. The virus is just genetic information that our bodies can use or reject.
Unfortunately, since viruses are not living things, man can modify them or create new ones. These can be our enemies. Our bodies, if healthy, have the intelligence to reject these man-made particles by using cellular innate immunity. But, some people will not use their God given intelligence and will allow these man-made particles to be injected right through that protective layer and into their bodies. Then, it's too late.
I will be writing extensively on these concepts soon.
Thank you for the explanation. So viruses that do cause disease would be considered rogues that don’t have anything to contribute to the cell? Why would cells replicate pathogenic viruses, then?
The virus is not the cause of the disease, although it looks like it is because of association. The disease is a collection of symptoms that MIGHT happen when the human body is taking the genetic information in the virus and incorporating it. This incorporation can be called an "update" to ones physiology, although many scientists prefer to not call it that. Whether or not a person displays symptoms or how severe the symptoms are; this is all tied to the condition of the immune system, not the virus. There is also "viral load" to consider. If a person comes in contact with inordinately high numbers of viruses that are pathogenic (associated with disease symptoms), even a healthy immune system can become overwhelmed and display symptoms. Remember though, symptoms of viral infections are always manageable with safe and proven methods that do not involve shots.
Why would cells replicate pathogenic viruses? The omicron variant is a good example. Omicron was a mutation done intelligently and on purpose using APOBEC enzymes inside of our cells to spread easily among the human population to give us cross reactive T-cell immunity to more virulent variants that could be forthcoming (some of which could be man-made). Humans will screw this up, though, by continuing to get booster shots. Booster shots will erase the T-cell cross reactivity. The boosted will be susceptible to future variants. The unvaccinated will not be susceptible to infection due to intact T-cell cross reactivity. Check out my 1 hour PowerPoint presentation on rumble.com/kevinstillwagon if you want to dig deeper.