She certainly isn't good but... that position holds little power. I'm sure she'll hear an ocean full of how she's wrong. We could do an information blitz on her and everyone send hundreds of studies that she... and most drs... have not read. We've got our foot in the door (can you imagine kamala picks! ) but we can't stop working. This is a lifelong fight to keep freedom.
Show me the bio-chemistry and stats to prove vaccine boosters don't work. Please. Start with life expectancy since the advent of antibiotics and Jenner.
The life expectancy improvements you mention are more attributable to improved sanitation than the advent of shots called vaccines. Appropriate use of antibiotics can in some instances save lives, but antibiotics are not vaccines. Life expectancy is now dropping in some areas since the widespread dissemination of the covid shot.
I'm sure you fully understand that life expectancy measures have multiple attributions, a hugely complex area. Here in UK there has been a lowering of life expectancy in poorer, less educated people. The causes appear to be related to diet, poor housing, psychological stress and debatably an actual lower vaccine uptake in these social groups. Covid appeared more prevalent in these areas, not always, but anecdote isn't data. (Our testing and tracing system was awaful to state it mildly). There appears no single causal factor I think.
Vaccine boosters work at boosting levels of antibodies, hence the name. When you boost levels of antibodies, you risk experiencing Antibody Dependent Enhancement of Infection, and Antibody Dependent Enhancement of Disease. Antibodies created from injections are suboptimal, and the bio-chemistry states that the tails of the suboptimal Y shaped antibodies can signal immune cells to replicate the antigen-antibody complex, instead of destroying it, enhancing the infection. Suboptimal antibodies can also kick off the complement cascade that enhances disease symptoms instead of ameliorating them.
What is the % risk of sub-optimal antibodies? As vaccination programmes suppress disease overall substantially there is clearly an issue with risk benefit analysis in the scenario you present. In fact, a 2023 study in the Lancet found people over 65 who received a bivalent booster were 72% less likely to need a hospital visit and 68% less likely to die from COVID-19. These numbers are substantial. Clearly older antibodies not dealing with newer viral variants very well is simply waning immunity to new variants and in the vast majority of cases is extremely unlikely to be attributable to syndromes.
Since the antibodies created from mRNA shots target one protein, when there is antigenic drift in that protein, the % risk of sub-optimal antibodies increases substantially. You said it best yourself... older antibodies not dealing with newer variants is problematic. You don't get these problems with natural infections as they result in antibodies to all parts of the invader, not just a small piece. That's why shots called vaccines that target single proteins will be a never-ending game of whack-a-mole.
I take your points. The problem with natural immunity starts with dangerous antigens that outwit and overwhelm so rapidly. The body's intelligence gathering and recording is simply too slow with dangerous variants. In such circumstances, other mitigations are needed to slow the pathogen. Partial prior intelligence, such as spike protein information, although not complete is better than none at all. Certainly the notion of natural herd immunity, an ideal goal, with a dangerous pathogen was abandoned with good reason imo. There is good evidence that vaccine assisted adaptive responses can actually be stronger, an additional tier, additional to the overall response reaction. A kind of 'pile on', excuse the wording. Certainly we haven't achieved a holy grail regardless.
Thank you for your excellent posts. This article from Gateway Pundit says that although she promoted the poisonous injections back in 2021, "Dr. Nesheiwat has since adjusted her stance as more data became available. She criticized the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for its handling of the vaccine’s rollout and mandates, particularly its impact on children." She said, “If CDC approves a COVID vaccine addition to the routine schedule of vax for kids, it will mark the most egregious unethical & harmful decision to children. No mandates. Especially for a vax that can’t prevent disease.” https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/trump-appoints-dr-janette-nesheiwat-former-covid-vaccine/
When I see the change, I’ll think hard about supporting her still. She seems the perfect AI Robotic Fauciesquette. Every point made in every clip I see so far has me in terror mode. Medical Freedom seems the last thought in her protocol.
The new national surgeon general needs to learn something from Florida’s surgeon general.
She certainly isn't good but... that position holds little power. I'm sure she'll hear an ocean full of how she's wrong. We could do an information blitz on her and everyone send hundreds of studies that she... and most drs... have not read. We've got our foot in the door (can you imagine kamala picks! ) but we can't stop working. This is a lifelong fight to keep freedom.
I can't say this enough -- thank you so much, Doc, for keeping us informed!
.
The Vaccinated
Have Become
Second Class Citizens
To Their Own Natural Immunity.
.
The new Surgeon General needs to get smart. She just sounds so establishment; not what’s needed at this point in time.
Surgeon General is part of DOD. Maybe she should go and research the DoD and their “step 2” process of the mixture they put into the modRNA shots.
Show me the bio-chemistry and stats to prove vaccine boosters don't work. Please. Start with life expectancy since the advent of antibiotics and Jenner.
The life expectancy improvements you mention are more attributable to improved sanitation than the advent of shots called vaccines. Appropriate use of antibiotics can in some instances save lives, but antibiotics are not vaccines. Life expectancy is now dropping in some areas since the widespread dissemination of the covid shot.
I'm sure you fully understand that life expectancy measures have multiple attributions, a hugely complex area. Here in UK there has been a lowering of life expectancy in poorer, less educated people. The causes appear to be related to diet, poor housing, psychological stress and debatably an actual lower vaccine uptake in these social groups. Covid appeared more prevalent in these areas, not always, but anecdote isn't data. (Our testing and tracing system was awaful to state it mildly). There appears no single causal factor I think.
Vaccine boosters work at boosting levels of antibodies, hence the name. When you boost levels of antibodies, you risk experiencing Antibody Dependent Enhancement of Infection, and Antibody Dependent Enhancement of Disease. Antibodies created from injections are suboptimal, and the bio-chemistry states that the tails of the suboptimal Y shaped antibodies can signal immune cells to replicate the antigen-antibody complex, instead of destroying it, enhancing the infection. Suboptimal antibodies can also kick off the complement cascade that enhances disease symptoms instead of ameliorating them.
What is the % risk of sub-optimal antibodies? As vaccination programmes suppress disease overall substantially there is clearly an issue with risk benefit analysis in the scenario you present. In fact, a 2023 study in the Lancet found people over 65 who received a bivalent booster were 72% less likely to need a hospital visit and 68% less likely to die from COVID-19. These numbers are substantial. Clearly older antibodies not dealing with newer viral variants very well is simply waning immunity to new variants and in the vast majority of cases is extremely unlikely to be attributable to syndromes.
Since the antibodies created from mRNA shots target one protein, when there is antigenic drift in that protein, the % risk of sub-optimal antibodies increases substantially. You said it best yourself... older antibodies not dealing with newer variants is problematic. You don't get these problems with natural infections as they result in antibodies to all parts of the invader, not just a small piece. That's why shots called vaccines that target single proteins will be a never-ending game of whack-a-mole.
I take your points. The problem with natural immunity starts with dangerous antigens that outwit and overwhelm so rapidly. The body's intelligence gathering and recording is simply too slow with dangerous variants. In such circumstances, other mitigations are needed to slow the pathogen. Partial prior intelligence, such as spike protein information, although not complete is better than none at all. Certainly the notion of natural herd immunity, an ideal goal, with a dangerous pathogen was abandoned with good reason imo. There is good evidence that vaccine assisted adaptive responses can actually be stronger, an additional tier, additional to the overall response reaction. A kind of 'pile on', excuse the wording. Certainly we haven't achieved a holy grail regardless.
Thank you for your excellent posts. This article from Gateway Pundit says that although she promoted the poisonous injections back in 2021, "Dr. Nesheiwat has since adjusted her stance as more data became available. She criticized the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for its handling of the vaccine’s rollout and mandates, particularly its impact on children." She said, “If CDC approves a COVID vaccine addition to the routine schedule of vax for kids, it will mark the most egregious unethical & harmful decision to children. No mandates. Especially for a vax that can’t prevent disease.” https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/trump-appoints-dr-janette-nesheiwat-former-covid-vaccine/
When I see the change, I’ll think hard about supporting her still. She seems the perfect AI Robotic Fauciesquette. Every point made in every clip I see so far has me in terror mode. Medical Freedom seems the last thought in her protocol.
I bolster mine even though I’m healthy by getting iv drips. Is that bad too?
No, that’s vitamin C
I don’t know if it has that vitamin in it or not. I get the one for gut health.