I remember when I was going through my chiropractic studies I came across the book, ‘The Poisoned Needle’. After reading that book and others, I realized vaccination was not a good idea. I used to cop a lot of vitriol from family and friends over not vaccinating my kids. Thanks for your input on the issue and may pilots be safe.
Vaccines are a great idea... for everyone else... but not for me ... this is why:
The Men Who Run the World and their minions have the ability to stop this. All they would have to do is employ some of the same strategies that were used to convince 6 billion to inject a deadly vaccine. They could easily crush demand for sugary drinks and processed foods by pounding them with high taxes.
We have seen how governments are capable of ending the addiction to tobacco. Why not do the same for sugary foods. I would argue that they decided to come down hard on smoking because it was killing people too quickly and damaging productivity on their farm. They did not make tobacco the enemy because they love ya’ll.
Why Don’t They Discourage Bad Dietary Choices and Stop Vaccinating?
Consider the impacts on the economy of not reducing the life spans of humans.
Let’s say 30% of the population of a country lived beyond 90 years. Pension plans would implode as there would not be enough money to cover redemptions. For those on public pensions, we could raise taxes to ensure pensioners get paid, but that would mean less money for schools, roads and other infrastructure. Government services would need to be dramatically scaled back resulting in huge job losses.
All of these elderly people would essentially be ‘useless eaters’ sapping the economic strength of the country to provide them with medical care and free bus passes, while they produce and contribute nothing.
Why did they ramp up the vaccine schedule in the 80’s? I would suggest that they did this because population (which grows exponentially) was about to get out of control so they needed to take action. What would our overall population be if not for the vaccine push and the dramatic increase in the availability of processed foods in recent decades?
You are Expendable
At the end of the day all they care about is having enough circus and barnyard animals to operate the farm. They could care less about you or your health - you are EXPENDABLE.
They most certainly do not want one third of the population living to 90+ Japan and China are prime examples of what happens when a country is top heavy on elderly citizens. Too few young people to support the elderly.
But these whole vaccinations can shed right? that is what caused the recent epidemics of polio wasn't it? and now they are going to Palestina and orally vaccinate all the kids there because one kid developed polio. Probably because of the devastating circumstances...
Yes, they most certainly do shed and spread. Purposely subjecting mass populations to this procedure is a huge mistake, as some prominent virologists are warning.
Everything she posted is in public domain. She said that many times. Nothing is highly classified. Some articles that she or Kathrine Watts posted might be behind a paywall, but nothing is " highly classified". Not sure why you repeating this lie.
Excellent reporting! The fact that people do not research or believe the truth about the shots demonstrates all the reasons the powers that be can use them to get rich on our ignorance and innocence
I think some scientists are confusing the anaphylaxis resulting from activation of mast cells with the activation of the complement system which can look like anaphylaxis. With mast cells, the antibodies that result from an exposure to a foreign toxin or protein are attached to the mast cell FIRST. Then when a subsequent exposure to the same toxin or protein occurs, the toxin or protein will attach to the antibodies that are already attached to the mast cells. This causes a violent release of histamines that will result in an immediate anaphylactic reaction that can be almost immediately relieved by antihistamines. Yes, this can happen immediately after a covid shot if the person is sensitized to polyethylene glycol or any other foreign substance that may be a contaminant.
Normally when antibodies are produced from exposures to foreign proteins that are injected by needles, these antibodies do not attach to mast cells or any other immune cells. These antibodies can take two weeks or more to develop (21 days) and will attach to the foreign protein on a second exposure. After that, the antibodies will attach to immune cells. They are not attached to immune cells first, as in a classic anaphylactic reaction. In some subsequent exposures to the same toxin or proteins, depending on how many antibodies are immediately available, the antibodies will attach to the toxin or protein in such a way that it signals the complement system to become activated. In some cases, this can be extremely violent and inflammatory, looking like anaphylaxis.
This would explain why a 21-day window or longer is required. The antibodies must be present, and it can take that long to produce them. It also explains why subsequent exposure to some crystalline substances will not do this as they generally do not cause antibody production.
I remember when I was going through my chiropractic studies I came across the book, ‘The Poisoned Needle’. After reading that book and others, I realized vaccination was not a good idea. I used to cop a lot of vitriol from family and friends over not vaccinating my kids. Thanks for your input on the issue and may pilots be safe.
Vaccines are a great idea... for everyone else... but not for me ... this is why:
The Men Who Run the World and their minions have the ability to stop this. All they would have to do is employ some of the same strategies that were used to convince 6 billion to inject a deadly vaccine. They could easily crush demand for sugary drinks and processed foods by pounding them with high taxes.
We have seen how governments are capable of ending the addiction to tobacco. Why not do the same for sugary foods. I would argue that they decided to come down hard on smoking because it was killing people too quickly and damaging productivity on their farm. They did not make tobacco the enemy because they love ya’ll.
Why Don’t They Discourage Bad Dietary Choices and Stop Vaccinating?
Consider the impacts on the economy of not reducing the life spans of humans.
Let’s say 30% of the population of a country lived beyond 90 years. Pension plans would implode as there would not be enough money to cover redemptions. For those on public pensions, we could raise taxes to ensure pensioners get paid, but that would mean less money for schools, roads and other infrastructure. Government services would need to be dramatically scaled back resulting in huge job losses.
All of these elderly people would essentially be ‘useless eaters’ sapping the economic strength of the country to provide them with medical care and free bus passes, while they produce and contribute nothing.
Why did they ramp up the vaccine schedule in the 80’s? I would suggest that they did this because population (which grows exponentially) was about to get out of control so they needed to take action. What would our overall population be if not for the vaccine push and the dramatic increase in the availability of processed foods in recent decades?
You are Expendable
At the end of the day all they care about is having enough circus and barnyard animals to operate the farm. They could care less about you or your health - you are EXPENDABLE.
They most certainly do not want one third of the population living to 90+ Japan and China are prime examples of what happens when a country is top heavy on elderly citizens. Too few young people to support the elderly.
https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control
But these whole vaccinations can shed right? that is what caused the recent epidemics of polio wasn't it? and now they are going to Palestina and orally vaccinate all the kids there because one kid developed polio. Probably because of the devastating circumstances...
thank you for standing up for truth!
Yes, they most certainly do shed and spread. Purposely subjecting mass populations to this procedure is a huge mistake, as some prominent virologists are warning.
Very good simple to understand information! Ignore it at your peril...
Everything she posted is in public domain. She said that many times. Nothing is highly classified. Some articles that she or Kathrine Watts posted might be behind a paywall, but nothing is " highly classified". Not sure why you repeating this lie.
Excellent reporting! The fact that people do not research or believe the truth about the shots demonstrates all the reasons the powers that be can use them to get rich on our ignorance and innocence
Right on!
Always excellent, Dr. Stillwagon. Thank you.
Also would appreciate any thoughts you have about Sasha Latypova's (lengthy) article today. Made a lot of sense to me...
The second shot, or what do vaccinators and sewer rats have in common? Reviewing Charles Richet's work on anaphylaxis, awarded the Nobel Prize in 1913. By Sasha Latypova (09/03/24): https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-second-shot-or-what-do-vaccinators
I think some scientists are confusing the anaphylaxis resulting from activation of mast cells with the activation of the complement system which can look like anaphylaxis. With mast cells, the antibodies that result from an exposure to a foreign toxin or protein are attached to the mast cell FIRST. Then when a subsequent exposure to the same toxin or protein occurs, the toxin or protein will attach to the antibodies that are already attached to the mast cells. This causes a violent release of histamines that will result in an immediate anaphylactic reaction that can be almost immediately relieved by antihistamines. Yes, this can happen immediately after a covid shot if the person is sensitized to polyethylene glycol or any other foreign substance that may be a contaminant.
Normally when antibodies are produced from exposures to foreign proteins that are injected by needles, these antibodies do not attach to mast cells or any other immune cells. These antibodies can take two weeks or more to develop (21 days) and will attach to the foreign protein on a second exposure. After that, the antibodies will attach to immune cells. They are not attached to immune cells first, as in a classic anaphylactic reaction. In some subsequent exposures to the same toxin or proteins, depending on how many antibodies are immediately available, the antibodies will attach to the toxin or protein in such a way that it signals the complement system to become activated. In some cases, this can be extremely violent and inflammatory, looking like anaphylaxis.
This would explain why a 21-day window or longer is required. The antibodies must be present, and it can take that long to produce them. It also explains why subsequent exposure to some crystalline substances will not do this as they generally do not cause antibody production.
🙏
Why did Sasha ban me when I asked her how she acquired ultra top secret documents that indicate the DOD is behind the Covid Vaccines etc....
My other question was... if by some miracle she was able to obtain ultra high classified documents of this nature... and publish them ...
Why was she not put in a cell next to Assange?
She refused to answer... called me a homo ... threatened me... then banned me
Here's why https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/substack-a-ministry-of-truth-production
Can you point to specific substack, article or interview where she claimed that she has published top secret, high classified documents?
Check her SS - she has published contracts with the DOD and pharma that demonstrate the DOD is behind the Covid Con.
As you surely are aware --- she brags about that constantly.
How did she get the contracts?
Why is she still alive if she has them and has published them?
I will tell you why https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/substack-a-ministry-of-truth-production