A new question answered:
…What happens to the LNP after it delivers the mRNA?
The Lipid Nanoparticles used in Pfizer and Moderna are basically large fat bubbles that contain smaller fat bubbles. The large fat bubble is about 100 nm in diameter, curiously the size of a virus particle. The size of the larger fat bubble is controlled by the presence of Polyethylene Glycol or PEG. The smaller fat bubbles are what contain the mRNA, and these will self-assemble in the manufacturing process. No, they are not assembling into nanobots that connect to the internet, they just automatically surround the negatively charged mRNA due to their positive charge. Neither Pfizer nor Moderna has revealed how many of these smaller fat bubbles are in each larger bubble.
But they did tell us what lipids they used. Pfizer used ALC-0315, Moderna used SM102. They are chemically different. They also revealed the nucleotide sequences of their proprietary mRNA concoctions. They are different from each other, and different from the original nucleotide sequence that was published for the Wuhan spike protein. So, they are making different proteins that don’t even match what was on the virus. That fact alone should have made anyone using their God given intelligence extremely suspicious.
But it’s worse than that. To make the mRNA more stable and last a long time, Pfizer and Moderna both used N1-methylpseudourine in various locations in their mRNA sequences. Pfizer used 801 of them, Moderna used 626. About two years after this stuff was injected into billions of humans, we learned that because of these pseudouridines, ribosomes that read the codes that make the proteins will chop off smaller proteins before the big one is done. These smaller proteins can either be biologically active and toxic, or they can closely resemble normal body proteins, resulting in autoimmune reactions. All this protein stuff is bad enough, but someone asked: What happens to those lipids that got left behind?
The answer is, they become extremely toxic and damaging to cellular components.
In this 30 minute video, Dr. Gabriele Segalla, Independent Research Biochemist, Specialist in Chemistry of microemulsions and colloidal systems, author of scientific publications and holder of various international patents (orcid.org/0000-0002-5969-3732), examines significant and surprising new aspects of the chemical-physical criticalities and toxicological potential of an mRNA vaccine.
The entire docu-video is based on the study by G. Segalla published in peer-review, on October 16, 2023, in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (IJVTPR), with the title "Apparent Cytotoxicity and Intrinsic Cytotoxicity of Lipid Nanomaterials Contained in a COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine".
Here's a link to the video: https://rumble.com/v40b2as-the-pandoras-vaccine.html
Here's a link to the study: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374760573_Apparent_Cytotoxicity_and_Intrinsic_Cytotoxicity_of_Lipid_Nanomaterials_Contained_in_a_COVID-19_mRNA_Vaccine
Thanks for reading, and thanks for staying smart.
wow. Not good. From the moment I saw they used PEG (and Johnson used Polysorbate, from the same toxic family) I knew I did not want this IN my body. I do not even want it ON my body - it sits in many shampoos and 2 years ago consumer magazine tested 150 and found chemical leftovers from the production in half of them PEG is made from poisonous, flammable and explodable gasses. If all goes well, the poison is 'washed' out. If not, leftovers are in the final product. This is what the chemist explained to me the year I worked at a chemical plant were basics for beauty products were made. I forgot a lot, but not that ! After all, why don't they make vaccines in oral form to begin with? Then the product goes through the digestive system and that will already filter out some grub. The vaccine for rabies in animals in Europe is oral and lasts their whole life. In the US they have a yearly and a 3-yearly (which is the same as the yearly only more expensive) injectable. Money money.
I remember seeing this on CT. Health And Human Services where SM102 was listed as an ingredient in Moderna. When it first came out. I checked and it said NOT for animal or Human use. It was quickly removed from the website. I believe it was shared by accident. Crazy and Dangerous!