The medical profession just loves to make statements such as this: “We live in a country where we do not fear polio, do not fear smallpox, do not fear diphtheria, pertussis, or measles the way we did years ago. We owe all of this to the vaccines that wiped out these public health menaces.”
Bullshit. Vaccines were not responsible for the disappearance of these diseases. If we assume vaccines are what wipe out diseases, then what about the bubonic plague and other infectious diseases that vaccines were never developed for? What wiped them out?
Part of the answer lies in the fact that infectious diseases follow biorhythmic patterns. They start off slowly, increase drastically, then drop off quickly; and this phenomenon may repeat itself several times, though years apart. You will see that the mass vaccination programs were always started during the rapid decline of these diseases, and the vaccines were given the credit for the inevitable declines.
Another part of the answer is the mode of transmission of the virus. If they are transmitted by ingestion, improvements in public sanitation played a major role. Therefore, we will always have sporadic breakouts of these types of viral illnesses in countries where food and water sanitation are issues, regardless of how aggressively we try to inoculate those people.
Another part is herd immunity. When a significant number of the population has the ability to NOT get infected, the virus will continue to spread as always, but it will no longer infect them. Since infections are required for copies of the virus to be made, less and less copies will be made, and the virus will no longer be propagated in large quantities.
Considering the efficacy of vaccines, each shot will be covered separately. The polio, swine flu, and covid-19 frauds were so involved that each of these has a chapter of its own.
Supposedly, smallpox was one of vaccination’s most astounding successes. Actually, it was a failure. Following is an address by William Howard Haye, MD, that was printed in the congressional record on June 25, 1937. He was reading from the book “Food or Drugs” by Dr. Paul M Koonin. Here is a link to the text: https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-43775180/view?partId=nla.obj-43775998#page/n8/mode/1up
“The true figures on vaccination for smallpox have never gone before the public, though they can be seen in the files of the various departments of the army as well as the government, if one cares to ask for them. If the record of vaccination in the Philippines alone were ever to become matter of general knowledge, it would finish vaccinations in the whole country, at least among those who are able to read and think for themselves.
After three years of the most rigid vaccination, when almost every little brown man had been vaccinated from one to six times, there occurred the severest epidemic of smallpox that the islands had ever seen, with death rate in places running to almost 60% and in all, well over 60,000 deaths.
Manila and the surrounding province were vaccinated most thoroughly, and they showed the highest case records and death record of the whole archipelago, while some of the outlying country was not so thoroughly vaccinated and escaped with proportionately less disease.
The only epidemic of smallpox it was ever my misfortune to attend, comprised thirty-three cases, with twenty-nine of vaccination history, some recent, and the unvaccinated cases did not have the disease in any more severe form than did those with vaccination history, even those of recent history.
For vaccination does NOT protect against smallpox, though it does much harm aside from its uselessness.”
Will we ever learn? Mass inoculation against covid-19 is having similar results today.
When proponents of natural healing opposed smallpox vaccinations back in the 20’s, 30’s, and 40’s, they were severely criticized by the medical profession. The natural healers said that the risks associated with it outweighed the benefits, and that one day, smallpox vaccination as a routine measure would be terminated. Fifty years later the medics finally agreed with them. On September 25, 1971, the CDC in Atlanta issued its weekly Morbidity and Mortality report. The title was “Vaccination against smallpox in the United States, a reevaluation of the risks and benefits”. They concluded that the risks of complications from the shot outweighed its benefits and nonselective vaccination of the public was no longer justifiable. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44071718
Today, the covid-19 shot risks outweigh the benefits in all age groups. Yet the CDC will not admit it.
The fact that the smallpox shot risks outweighed the benefits was too embarrassing for the medicine men to reveal to the public, so what reason did they give for terminating the vaccine? Very slyly they used mass media to convince people that the vaccine had eradicated smallpox in the world, and routine smallpox vaccinations were no longer necessary.
Few of the currently widely-used vaccines would genuinely be worth the trouble if everyone supplemented vitamin D3 sufficiently to attain, in general, at least 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (made in the liver from vitamin D3 cholecalciferol). This is what the immune system needs to deliver full-strength innate and adaptive responses to bacterial, viral and fungal pathogens and to greatly reduce the risk of wildly-dysregulated hyper-inflammatory inflammation - indiscriminate cell destruction. The 25-hydroxyvitamin D is not a hormone. It does not regulate anything. The 50 ng/mL level enables enough 25-hydroxyvitamin D to diffuse into immune (and other) cells so that each cell's vitamin D based intracrine (inside the cell) and paracrine (to nearby cells) signaling systems can work properly. These signaling systems are only turned on in specific circumstances. When they work properly, they change cellular behaviour, in response to the cell's changing circumstances. The condition to activate the signaling cascade differs from one cell type to the next, as does the dozens or hundreds of up- and down-regulated genes which alter the cell's behavior.
For 70 kg 154 lb body-weight, to attain this proper 50 ng/mL 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, 0.125 mg 5000 IU vitamin D3 a day is required. Please see Prof. Sunil Wimalawansa's recent article "Rapidly Increasing Serum 25(OH)D Boosts the Immune System, against Infections - Sepsis and COVID-19" https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/14/2997 and the research articles cited at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ , starting with the first graph there, from Quraishi et al. 2014: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/1782085 which shows post-operative infections rising dramatically in proportion to how far below 50 ng/mL the patient's pre-operative 25-hydroxyvitamin D was.
Without such proper supplementation, which is more than most doctors think necessary, or even safe, many people's 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are between 5 and 25 ng/mL, which entails risk of both hospital-acquired and surgical site infections of 45% to 18% respectively, while all those with 50 ng/mL or more 25-hydroxyvitamin D had risks of 2.5%
But where would be profit or priestly glory in that?
Instead most doctors pretend to think of themselves as akin to priests, injecting a tiny concoctions made by angels in distant, very high-tech, laboratories, to (supposedly) protect each individual and elevate them to a class of cleanliness, distinct from the unclean masses not so blessed.
Most people and doctors think that influenza vaccine reduces the risk of hospitalisation and death. However, simple, very solid, research in England and Wales, shows that for 65 year olds, whose rate of vaccination more than doubles from age 64 to 66 due to a government campaign, there is no detectable decrease in the rate of hospitalisation or death from influenza or other respiratory diseases, which increases steadily with age: https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/influenza-vaccines-do-not-reduce
Vaccines - and both the public and medical professional's unrealistic beliefs about them - very often *are* the problem. Vaccines are given instead of recommendations and support for proper nutrition and/or early treatment. This is the crime against humanity of the COVID-19 responses, but we can see that this obsession with vaccines to the exclusion of better, less glamorous, less pseudo-sophisticated approaches, has a long history.
As I learned in the beginning of my natural healing career over 52 years ago, the current line of demarcation started with the difference between Louis Pasteur v. Antonine BeChamp. From that understanding, I came to say, "There isn't anything mankind can do that our Creator through Nature has not already done. Never underestimate the power of either." It is so refreshing to read from medical professionals, including allopathic medical doctors, expressing the wisdom of nature.
I hope and pray this trend of going back to the future using natural healing and natural medicine continues. - Dr. James Chappell