Hepatitis A was not covered in the original 1984 version of The Silent Killers as the shot was first approved for use in the USA in 1995. What’s the difference between Hepatis A and B? They are completely different viruses, as are their modes of transmission. An infection by hepatitis B requires direct blood to blood contact. It cannot be transmitted by close personal contact unless the mucosal lining is broken as with certain sexual activities and sharing of needles. This fact alone should make you wonder why babies are injected with it on day one.
Much differently, hepatitis A can be transmitted by the oral-fecal route. This means that if you swallow contaminated food or water, and are susceptible, you might develop symptoms. How serious are the symptoms? Not very serious unless you’ve already got liver problems. In fact, “children under the age of 6 often do not show any symptoms.”: https://www.hepb.org/blog/whats-difference-hepatitis-vs-hepatitis-b/ As you know, asymptomatic infections can still provide that lifelong protection of infection immunity. The symptoms, if they appear, are related to liver inflammation. Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pains, fever, and jaundice are examples. Most cases of this will resolve without any treatment at all unless the person is significantly immunosuppressed.
How and why does this virus affect the liver? After swallowing the virus, if it can get past the acids in the stomach that normally destroy virus particles by oxidation, it ends up in the small intestine. “The mechanism of penetration of the hepatitis A virus from the intestine into the blood is not exactly known.”: https://m.iliveok.com/health/pathogenesis-hepatitis_109041i15955.html One explanation could be an unhealthy gut microbiome, allowing easier access by loosening the “tight junction” between epithelial cells. The fact is, not everyone who swallows it will allow it to get through. If it does get through and into the bloodstream, it makes its way to the liver as all blood eventually does, for detoxification. There are receptors on liver cells that will allow the virus to attach. After attachment, the virus can be accepted by the cell and copies will be made. The immune system reaction is cytotoxic T-cells recognizing and destroying these cells that contain the viruses. The level of tissue destruction determines the level of hepatitis (liver inflammation) that occurs. Some scientists even classify the hepatitis resulting from a viral infection as an autoimmune disease because the immune system is destroying liver tissue to clear the virus.
The point is, the virus must get into the bloodstream to affect you, so why inject it on purpose? When you swallow it, you MIGHT have to deal with it. When you inject it, you DEFINITELY have to deal with it. That’s why one of the possible side effects of injecting it is…you guessed it…hepatitis.
What is being injected? There are three shots marketed in the USA. They are HAVRIX and TWINRIX by GSK, and VAQTA by Merck. They all contain the whole Hepatitis A virus that has been copied in the MRC-5 cell line from an aborted Caucasian male fetus in 1966. After the viruses are collected, they are supposedly inactivated by formalin (formaldehyde). Both companies admit that some parts of the aborted cells, including DNA can be in the shots. Both also state that the rubber tips of the vials are made of natural latex rubber and can cause allergic reactions. There can also be residual formaldehyde and neomycin in the shots. Aluminum is used as the adjuvant, and this can be a problem for people who cannot eliminate toxic aluminum from their bodies. As mentioned previously, these shots must be carefully prepared and mixed by a technician prior to injection, and the mixture must have a specific appearance, or it is to be discarded. Unless you use sophisticated laser counting equipment, you have absolutely no idea how many supposedly inactivated virus particles attached to aluminum are going into your body. Here are the links to the package inserts of all three, HAVRIX: www.fda.gov/media/119388/download VAQTA: www.fda.gov/media/74519/download TWINRIX: www.fda.gov/media/119351/download
TWINRIX contains both A and B viruses and is only approved for people over 18 years of age. It also contains extra antigens from the shell of the A virus that are made by yeast cells and then injected. They do this by inserting the genes to make these viral proteins into the genome of yeast. This is called genetic recombination using CRISPR technology. This gene editing technique is also being done on humans. There is a very important statement in section 12.1 of the TWINRIX package insert that should be shouted from every rooftop: “Natural infection provides lifelong immunity even when antibodies to hepatitis A are undetectable.” Translation: The protection of infection immunity is cellular and has nothing to do with antibodies. Fauci does not want you to know that.
Does injecting this stuff give lifelong immunity to future infections in mass populations? Absolutely not. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17873531/ Outbreaks of Hepatitis A still occur and are most common in areas with poor sanitation and hygiene. This almost always occurs after natural disasters, even in areas with high vaccination rates.
You’ve got me wondering if all these “illnesses” our service members are coming down with, are a result of taking 20 vaccines in a day.
Isn’t it odd that service members keep coming down with the same weird illnesses but it’s always something else?
Oh no, it’s agent orange… oh no, it’s depleted uranium shells and mysterious saddam gasses…. Oh no, it’s “burn pits”….
Don’t recall all these illnesses in troops before mass vaccination…
As I read through each of these excellent articles... I am left wondering... are their any vaccines that are of any value?
Or are they all just a heap of bullshit that carry more risks that do the actual diseases they supposedly prevent - and which most people are unlikely to contract regardless of if they vaxxed of not.