Mumps is a great childhood illness to talk about because the symptoms of it are easily identifiable; swollen salivary glands in the neck and sometimes swollen testicles in boys. It can be tricky though, because 30% of mumps cases are completely asymptomatic. So, if you think you never had the mumps as a child, you probably did. Even asymptomatic cases will confer long term protection of infection immunity and long-term memory to make antibodies as an adaptive immune response if the protection of infection fails. Therefore, purposely injecting the mumps virus into a child or adult that already has natural immunity is not necessary and can expose them to other risks.
Parents are frightened about a case of mumps leaving their child sterile, deaf or brain damaged. These types of outcomes will only happen in the significantly immunosuppressed. And since you are injecting a “live” attenuated virus, the same outcomes are possible if too many viruses are injected into a person whose immune system cannot clear them. The proof of that is in any of the vaccine package inserts by reading the adverse reactions section.
A natural infection of mumps in children is nothing to be afraid of. In fact, most cases of mumps completely resolve themselves without treatment of any kind. Mumps is such a mild disease in infants, that the scientific community originally objected to using a standalone shot to create antibodies. The only standalone shot for mumps was called MUMPSVAX and was discontinued years ago. Here is the link to information about MUMPSVAX: https://www.drugs.com/cons/mumpsvax.html
There is a section in that link titled “Interactions with Medicines” that is not usually present in vaccine package inserts. It states, “Receiving this vaccine with any of the following medicines is not recommended.” There are 60 listed. “Receiving this vaccine with any of the following medicines is usually not recommended” it states. There are 44 more listed. “Receiving this vaccine with any of the following medicines may cause an increased risk of certain side effects” it states. There are 8 more. People don’t usually consider the fact that they are injecting a pharmaceutical product that can adversely interact with other pharmaceuticals, but they should. Any time you allow something to be injected into your body, you are putting yourself at all sorts of risks. Yeah, I know, getting into the driver’s seat of a car is putting yourself at risk too. But you have choices when it comes to transporting yourself from place to place. You must also have informed choices of what you allow or don’t allow into your body or your child’s body. Sadly, most people know more about how a car works than how their immune system works.
Then there’s the warning about not using it in a child that has immune deficiency or even a family history of immune deficiency. You now know the reason is because the entire “weakened” viruses are being injected, and when you inject them into immune “weakened” persons, the symptoms of the disease can appear, sometimes severely.
Digging deeper we find this link: https://www.drugs.com/dosage/mumps-virus-vaccine.html where you will see a section called “Precautions”. There is a contradictory statement in that section: “According to the manufacturer's labeling, febrile illness is considered a contraindication to the vaccine; however, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends that all vaccines can be administered to individuals with minor illnesses with or without low-grade fever.” In other words, the manufacturers who tested the product say; do not inject it into people who are sick. But the doctors on that ACIP committee who have ties to the pharmaceutical industry, advise the CDC, and stand to get rich by pushing it say; go ahead, it’s safe to inject it anyway. Criminals.
The same section warns about the possibility of contamination and transmission of other blood-borne viral agents and unknown infectious agents. People like me warn about this possibility all the time and are called “mis-informants”. Further down the page, a warning “The vaccine should not be injected into a blood vessel.” You have no control over where the tip of the needle is when that plunger is pushed.
Under “Other Comments”; “Mumps vaccine should be administered 1 month apart from other live virus vaccines.” So, what has the corrupt FDA allowed to happen to the mumps shot that was discontinued? Concurrent administration of the mumps virus along with the measles and rubella viruses. In the MMR shot. Recommended and “required” in some states to get into school.
Here’s how deep the corruption goes: Merck was the only pharmaceutical company that made and distributed the MMR shot (Proquad, MMR-II, and Varivax) in the United States up until GlaxoSmithKline got approval for PRIORIX in June of 2022. Several years ago, Merck was about to lose their approval to continue distributing their products if they could not keep their efficacy numbers for mumps above 95%. Efficacy for the mumps shot is simply based on antibody production in recipients, not on preventing symptoms. Competitors were unable to achieve those numbers. But Merck did achieve 95% “efficacy”, by fraudulently adding animal antibodies to their results, boosting the numbers, according to two insider whistleblowers. You can read about that here: https://www.reuters.com/article/health-vaccine-idUSL1N0YQ0W820150604 The trial goes on. So, how did GSK get approval? By stating in their documents that “The effectiveness of PRIORIX is based on determination of non-inferior antibody responses compared to the US-licensed vaccine, M-M-R II”. Here is a link to all the approval documents for PRIORIX: https://www.fda.gov/media/159591/download
Does injecting mumps viruses prevent cases of mumps? No, in fact here is one instance where a vaccinated asymptomatic person was responsible for an outbreak of mumps: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6922a2.htm We still have outbreaks in highly vaccinated groups. The CDC admits that cases have risen since 2006 in people who were “vaccinated”: https://www.cdc.gov/mumps/outbreaks.html “Experts aren’t sure why vaccinated people still get mumps” is a quote from that CDC publication. The answer is simple: Injecting viruses will never provide cellular protection of infection, a dilemma that has plagued vaccinologists for decades.
It is quite satisfying that The Plandemonium has inadvertently shined a spotlight on the corrupt American health bureaucracies and their poisonous childhood vaccine schedule.
The influence of billionaires seemingly over-rides science and reason. Or the science becomes whatever the billionaires want it to be?
Here is a quote from The Politico article about the Gates Foundation getting World leaders to use the jabs:
'Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates — his former wife — spoke directly to then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel about the distribution of Covid vaccine, according to German government documents obtained by POLITICO and WELT.'
Having watched the video of the two of them sat on a sofa laughing about the World not being able to ignore the next pandemic, I have never put much faith in their timely divorce. When we talk about the influence of Bill Gates we really should be saying Bill AND Melinda Gates.
The Politico article:
How Bill Gates and partners used their clout to control the global Covid response — with little oversight
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/14/global-covid-pandemic-response-bill-gates-partners-00053969