When I first saw the images coming out of China with people dropping dead on the streets and hazmat suits, I knew that something was seriously wrong. And it wasn’t an invisible scary virus. The danger was unsubstantiated propagated fear 24/7 shoved in our faces by mass media. I knew this fear was going to be used to get people to do something really stupid – willingly give up their freedoms for the backwards thinking idea that attacking this virus will unite the world and bring us all together.
Attacking viruses is a war against God and nature that man cannot win. There needs to be a significant change in how we perceive what viruses are and why they even exist, or we are doomed. Admittedly there are some people in the minority who are convinced that viruses do not even exist. I am not one of those people. Here are my thoughts on this. There are electron microscope images of these virus particles inside of our cells, outside of them and attached to them. The accepted science says that proteins on the virus shell attach to receptors on human cells, allowing either a merge of the membranes or a complete acceptance of the virus particle by the cell in an endosome. Then, the genetic material inside of the virus is used to make more copies of these virus particles. After that, they are released from the cell. The problem is, we’ve never witnessed that happening and probably never will, due to the limitations of microscopy. What we do know is, stuff called viruses contain genetic material that can be detected and measured, whether or not the particles are purified and isolated. And when you add this stuff to living cells under certain conditions, you get more of it. That is a measurable and verifiable fact. The scientists who deny the existence of the viral particles will say, “Yes, there is more genetic stuff, but is it actually a virus particle or something else.”
Some scientists say that the virus itself is controlling all this merging and replicating. Some even say that the virus will mutate itself to escape the immune system. That is false thinking, as these particles are not alive and have no intelligence. All of what is happening is being done by the intelligence within the living cell. The mutations are being done by APOBEC enzymes within our cells. Links to the newly discovered science on APOBEC are in the preamble to Chapter 5 and the discussion about the flu shot in Chapter 5. Random mutations of RNA viruses will always happen because RNA polymerase, the stuff that copies them, never checks for mistakes. But the key to a mutation that will remain prevalent is that it must be the same in many of us, so there must be intelligence involved.
Why do virus particles even exist? Everything seen and unseen exists for a reason. The reason could be for genetic updates to our bodies. We are made of proteins, not DNA. The message to make these proteins is in the DNA. For a new protein to be made that is not in the DNA, the message to make it must come from somewhere else. The message could be in these virus particles that we are communicating with all the time. APOBEC enzymes can take part of the genetic information inside of viruses and use it to make new proteins to change cellular functions. The information can even be permanently integrated into the genome. Scientists admit that half of the human genome came from viral insertions. See Chapter 5 – Part 8: Genetic Changes.
Even when all of this is happening, symptoms may or may not be present, depending on the condition of the immune system. Cells of the immune system will clear these particles from the body, sometimes without any symptoms at all. Serum antibodies come into play by marking the particles for destruction AFTER infection, not before. Antibodies do not destroy nor eliminate viruses; the innate immune cells do that.
What does any of this science have to do with freedom? Everything, because if you do not understand how the immune system works, prevents you from infections, and clears the infection if it does happen, you can be easily tricked into believing that you must put something into your body to “protect” you. They will also convince you that you need to do this to “protect” others.
The protection they are talking about is the creation of serum antibodies and the memory to remake them that will be in place to react to the infection if it happens. These antibodies cannot prevent the infection from happening, nor can they prevent the spread of the infection, and they were never designed to do that. If antibodies do their job and can mark the antigen proteins on the virus or bacteria that has made its way into the blood or lymph, the idea is that severe disease symptoms can be prevented. There are two major problems with this idea:
First, the antibody to antigen match must be perfect. Many times, it is not perfect due to “antigenic drift” because the virus gets mutated. This antigenic drift is generally not a problem after a natural infection because the T-cells get trained to recognize ALL parts of the virus so that these mutations will not get past them. Antigenic drift is a problem with these shots called vaccines because they can end up making the T-cell memory too specific and subsequent infections will happen.
Second, the very act of injecting something to stimulate antibody production can weaken the ability of the innate immune cells to do their job. See Chapter 5: The Immunization Fraud – Part 5, Use of the Wrong Vaccine Culture for links to the science showing the loss of Toll Like Receptors, T-cells, and Natural Killer cells after receiving an mRNA injection.
When an infection occurs, the replication of the virus particle happens initially in the epithelial layer that is exposed to the outside world. If this replication is not stopped by innate immune cells, the replicated virus particles will make it back outside and spread to other humans. Yes, this is asymptomatic transmission, and it happens all the time. Viruses transmit constantly, but the symptoms do not. The disease is the symptoms that MIGHT happen upon contact with viruses, entirely dependent upon the reaction of the immune system. In fact, a person can be infected, have no symptoms at all, and end up with lifelong immunity without even knowing it. See chapter 6 about polio. This brings us to the concept of herd immunity. Proponents of vaccines will say that they help us get to herd immunity. Herd immunity can only happen when enough of the population has the ability to NOT get infected. You cannot vaccinate your way to herd immunity because the injected will lose their ability to prevent infections. Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, a respected vaccinologist, has been screaming this from the beginning.
So, the important question is, why do some communicable diseases seem to decline. The answer is twofold. First, the mode of transmission may have been affected simply by improvement in sanitation and environmental conditions. Improvements in food and water sanitation made people less likely to encounter organisms that transmit by the oral/fecal route. Improvements in air quality reduced the contact with organisms that spread by aerosolized particles that attach to larger particulate matter in air pollution. Again, it is not the virus or bacteria that causes the illness, it is the response of weakened or overreactive immune systems that result in the symptoms of illness. So, reducing the exposure by default will reduce the level of expressed illness. Second, many people were already naturally infected, and had no symptoms. These people developed long lasting robust cellular protection of infection immunity, secretory mucosal IgA protection, and the adaptive response of serum antibodies before they got injected. Some of these people were able to keep their cellular and IgA protection of infection immunity after being injected, so herd immunity was able to be reached.
From the original 1984 version of The Silent Killers: Now why is it that you read in this book that the situation on vaccines is confused, yet what everyone knows from reading the newspapers and has known since vaccines were introduced, is that the situation was and is marvelous? Dr. Paul Meier, PhD, a biostatistician from the University of Chicago who wrote extensively about the 1954 polio trials said, “The reason for this discrepancy lies, I think, in a new attitude of many public health and publicity men. It is hard to convince the public that something is good. Consequently, the best way to push forward a new program is to decide on what you think the best decision is and not question it thereafter, and further, not to raise questions before the public or expose the public to open discussion of the issues.” (This is what happened with the covid shot and project Warp Speed).
In any event, the records have shown that there is a reasonable degree of doubt in both the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Also, there is reasonable doubt concerning the impact of mass administration of vaccines on future generations. There is sufficient doubt about examination on an individual basis to determine benefits vs. risk for each and every person to be immunized.
The issue is not one of vaccine or no vaccine. That is an individual decision and must be made between the doctor and patient. The real issue is: Does the government have the right to introduce into your body, without due process, any substance it wants to? It is this issue that all Americans must necessarily address. Let those who want the vaccine have it. But do not force those who don’t wish to have it.
Proponents of vaccines should have no problem accepting this freedom of choice. They do not have to be afraid of getting the diseases; in their minds the shots will protect them, right? Until enough people wake up and change the law, people who do not want their kids to have the shots will continue to be harassed. Some parents may even give in because they can see no way out.
There IS a way out. The trouble is, few people know about it. Uncle Sam the Medicine Man does not want you to know about it. In some states there is a small clause in the law that says children do NOT have to be inoculated. If the parent or guardian objects in writing on religious, moral, or ethical grounds with STRONG conviction. Such a letter is usually addressed to the school superintendent and should include statements as: “My belief against vaccinations is sincere, and I hold my belief with the strength of a religious conviction.” Or, “My conscience would be seriously disturbed and I would get no rest or peace if I allowed my child to be vaccinated.”
Even after such a letter has been written, your child might still be sent home with a bag over his head that says: “Our records indicate that your child has not been properly immunized. He is therefore prohibited from all classes until the proper requirements are met.”
This is a direct violation, not only of your American rights, but your basic rights of freedom as a human being. NO ONE has the right to inject a foreign substance into your body or your child’s body against your will.
As of this writing, the following states in America have given up their rights to the religious freedom clause: California, Mississippi, West Virginia, Connecticut, New York, and Maine. If you live in one of those states and don’t want your children jabbed, you have four choices: Change the law, private school, home school, or leave the state.
Excellent article Dr. Stillwagen. We really need to keep building on this very honest, non-hysterical, immune system centered discussion about vaccines and our health in general. As I read and research I can't help but think that mass pursuit of high Vitamin D3 sufficiency would bring about dramatic reductions in all infectious disease, if not cancer also. Aside from all the data that shows that people having the worst outcomes with various illnesses, including Covid-19, tend to have the lowest Vitamin D sufficiency, there are studies that point to a magic number of high sufficiency that seems to be where protection plateaus out.. that being 50 ng/ml.
First off, there are two very different studies, one for Covid-19, and one for post-surgical bacterial (i.e. "hospital") infections that both point to this same sufficiency target;
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/1782085
Locally weighted scatter plot smoothing plots (Figure 1 and Figure 2) showed a near inverse relationship between 25 (OH)D level and the risk for nosocomial infection for 25(OH)D
levels around 30 ng/mL. Between 25(OH)D levels of 30 ng/mL and 50 ng/mL, there was a progressive flattening of the curve. Beyond 50 ng/mL, the curve appeared flat.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.22.21263977v1
COVID-19 mortality risk correlates inversely with vitamin D3 status, and a mortality rate close to zero could theoretically be achieved at 50 ng/ml 25(OH)D3: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
Finally, we should probably ask the question; Is there an evolutionary basis for this being a magic blood level, knowing that for most of human history Vitamin D came from sun exposure, and that all human evolutionary roots stem from Africa? The simple answer is YES! noting that 115nmol/l equates to 46 ng/ml. This was the average of the two tribes measured.. the Maasai average was actually 47.6 ng/ml.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22264449/
doi: 10.1017/S0007114511007161. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
Traditionally living populations in East Africa have a mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration of 115 nmol/l
So the picture becomes very clear I think, based on three very different data points, one viral, one bacterial, one evolutionary, all telling the same story: Our immune systems were designed to operate with Vitamin D3 blood levels in the range of 50 ng/ml.
Here is another summary of the Vitamin D vs health story put together by a passionate person;
https://vitamindstopscovid.info/
"Everyone needs at least 50 ng/mL 125nmol/L 25-hydroxyvitamin D for their immune system to function properly. Without proper vitamin D3 supplementation, most people's 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are 1/2 to 1/10th this - greatly raising the risk of severe symptoms from COVID-19, Kawasaki disease, Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and sepsis."
The lack of exemptions for all scheduled vaccines are a problem here in Australia. The GOVT has tied vaccination to taxation, schooling and day care. Deplorable manipulative practice. https://www.health.gov.au/news/clinical-update-no-jab-no-pay