Bird Flu: Looking for the wrong things
… in all the wrong places.
Recently I was interviewed by Yvonne Katsande, an investigative reporter on LN24International.com. The subject of bird flu came up. She asked if what is being done is scientifically justified. You can skip this video and read the transcript below.
Yvonne asks: The European Union has banned the import of US chickens. There's been talks about bird flu. They did cite concerns about chlorine washing and a few other concerns. So, do you think that this is scientifically justified, or could just this be a cultural difference or otherwise?
Kevin answers: We need to just let that disease run its course. If we start trying to interfere with it, we're just going to make things worse. They've done this process in the United States that just absolutely makes no sense whatsoever. They're testing for the presence of the bird flu virus with a swab. Either they're swabbing the mucus in the oral or the rectal region of these birds, and they're looking for the presence of a virus. Well, you'll find it there. You'll basically find it anywhere you look for it, because it can be anywhere and everywhere. And just because you find it in the mucus, which is OUTSIDE of the animal's body, that doesn't mean that animal will be infected or is infected. So, what they're doing is, they're finding evidence that, yeah, the virus is there. And then they're demanding that these farms exterminate their entire chicken flocks, exterminate all of them, even the ones that are completely healthy. That makes no sense because you're not giving the animal the opportunity to come in harmony with the virus. There's a message in there that needs to be transmitted through that herd, and once it does, then herd immunity is reached. Herd immunity is defined as the ability of a certain percentage of the population to NOT become infected. And the only way that you're going to reach that is if a certain number of the herd has become naturally infected, and built that natural barrier that protects future infections, and it's going to be in the mucosal layer and you can test for that. You can absolutely test for mucosal immunity. And we're not doing that. That's what we should be doing. We should be testing for mucosal immunity, not looking for the presence of a virus, which doesn't mean anything.
Yvonne asks: So why isn't that being done? Is that deliberate, just like we saw with the COVID-19 using the PCR test, that really didn't help with anything?
Kevin answers: No, it doesn't help with anything. And you know I'm just a simple country chiropractor, but I can tell you we have the ability right now in humans and animals to test for mucosal immunity against anything. You can test for bird flu, you can test for COVID, you can test for measles, chicken pox, the flu. You can test for those. You can also test for T cell cross reactivity. So, if your mucosal barrier fails, your second line of defense is cytotoxic T cells that have the ability to detect cells that are making viral proteins and destroy those cells before the virus gets past the epithelial barrier. We can test for that right now. We have the ability but we're not doing it. What are we doing? We're testing for (serum) antibodies. That only means the person did experience some kind of an exposure, which could have been recently, or it could have been a long time ago, we don't know.
Yvonne states: The science, in itself, is not even complete transparent science. That's exactly what we're saying here.
Kevin responds: We’re looking for all the wrong things in all the wrong places. We could fix that overnight.
Thanks for reading, and thanks for staying smart.
Our deceptive medical institutions told us that a PCR test diagnosed Covid. It did not diagnose anything but the presence of molecules. There’s no way a Polymerase Chain Reaction test is used as a diagnostic tool but it does amplifies or creates more copies. It looks for genetic material. It does not tell us if there’s an active virus, it’s just tells us that there are molecules present. That’s its purpose. It does not mean any of those molecules are active. During Covid they used much to high cycle thresholds to amplify these molecules, I believe intentionally to mislead the public about how many Covid cases there were. When the cycle thresholds are too high it amplifies the amount of molecules. It’s simply how the science works.
Thank you, Doctor Stillwagon. Greatly appreciate your plain language explanation of the current ‘bird flu’ scam for us lay people out here in ‘fly-over’ country. We may be rural residents, considered ‘hay-seeds’ or ‘hicks’, but many of us (older) learned to read when there was actual emphasis placed on comprehension and discernment, and we HAVE been able to do our own research and see through the hand-waving and intentional mis-direction of so-called authorities (maybe that’s why the Covid scam/shot scam was implemented - to ‘cull’ older people having institutional memory). Seems there are those ‘experts’ whose sole purpose in life is enabling continued funding by scaring/scamming the public/public treasury.
Ordinary people look at this mess and think why are they cooking up misbegotten pathogens (say, at SEPRL), then somehow accidentally releasing same to wild fowl populations ‘just to see what happens’ (of course that would be translated into geek-speak and would cover 5 pages of an important paper accepted for publication which would point out just how truly clever those manipulators have become). But they are not clever, nor are they ethical, nor are they practical. They simply have too much money, and too much time, and too much power. Take away their money, disinfect entire research facilities, prohibit such (gain-of-function style) ‘studies’. And admit that any testing is set up to show the results they want, to be able to get even more money, fear-mongering the citizen population (at least the last portion still believing these concocted scenarios). The rest of us are not going to be bamboozled again. Bird flu is the new Covid scare, and SEPRL is the current WUHAN lab. Someone at the USDA needs to be in serious discussions with Mr. Kennedy, and get on the same page: NO to (supposed) vaccines for chickens. Any vaccines will be leaky, and leaky vaccines will make things worse. Tinkering with Mother Nature will get your ass kicked.